I can’t seem to shake off this idea of photographic intent. After having researched the topic a little, there seems to be a school of thought that photographic intention should be clear. Yes, I do get that, and in many cases it is an important aspect of the photographic experience. Though I’m really struggling to reconcile that dogma personally.
Clearly, showing intent is unavoidable as you essentially choose the moment. But for me it seems to be the degree of it (if that is possible). With ‘intent’ I see something like this:
- Balance: between the style (form) and substance (content) of the photo. if it’s too stylistic the intent feels too pushed.
- The message: is the photographer pushing the idea in my face and how many stories are there?
- The obvious: ironies, forms (e.g. symmetry etc) that were framed.
- Fluidity: the degree in which the photo seems to live by itself.
- A decisive moment: the spontaneity caught of events unfolding.
- Chance: the degree to which something seems to have occurred by itself.
Essentially if the intent is/becomes too obvious a photo loses some of its magic for me. When examining my own photos it seems that I’m often drawn to the first shot of a particular sequence – the one you take with the least bit of thought…